Phone-tapping Police submit corrected chargesheet with evidence

The Nampally court had returned the chargesheet in the phone-tapping case as the police have not provided the details of DVD about the photos of “Musi River, SIB office and intelligence office”.
The court returned the chargesheet two times and the police filed the chargesheet three times. First time the court returned it to police on June 18 and the police resubmitted the chargesheet the same day.
On June 18, the court found lapses in the submission and returned it to the police. Some of them are that the Special Investigation Team (SIT) mentioned the FIR number as 243/2034 instead of 243/2024.
Along with them, a letter was dated April 11, 2024, but the police mentioned it as April 16, 2024. Another letter was dated May 20, 2024, but it was mentioned as April 10, 2024.
In the form-60, the total number of papers were four, but the police mentioned it as six in the chargesheet.  After the police resubmitted the chargesheet, the court rejected it again by citing lack of evidence material on June 22.
After making corrections, the police submitted a chargesheet and evidence in two boxes and compact disks (CD) in a plastic cover to the 14th Chief Metropolitan Magistrate on Tuesday afternoon.
While submitting the evidence, Public Prosecutor Samba Shiva Reddy requested the court not to give evidence to the accused.
A source said that it is common to return the chargesheet to the police in courts.
But due to the mistakes in the chargesheet, the accused filed a petition for mandatory bail before the court.