The Supreme Court on Friday sought responses from the Uttar Pradesh government and others on two separate pleas challenging the notification prohibiting the manufacturing, storage, sale and distribution of food products with halal certification within the state, except for items produced for export.
The November 18 last year notification was issued by the office of Commissioner, Food Safety and Drug Administration, Uttar Pradesh, under section 30 (2) (a) of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. The petitions came up for hearing before a bench of Justices B R Gavai and Sandeep Mehta which issued notice to the Uttar Pradesh government, Centre and others seeking their responses on the pleas.
Initially, the bench questioned the advocates representing the petitioners as to why the apex court should entertain the pleas under Article 32 of the Constitution and why they should not approach the high court first.
Article 32 of the Constitution deals with remedies for enforcement of rights and 32 (1) says that right to move the apex court by appropriate proceedings for enforcement of rights conferred by this part is guaranteed. The lawyer representing one of the petitioners said the issue involved pan-India ramifications and also has an impact on trade and commerce.
“Even high court’s order would be having a pan-India effect. If suppose a particular instrument is stayed by the high court, the stay will be applicable throughout the country,” the bench observed.
The top court said the issue of inter-state trade and commerce can also be considered by the high court.
Supreme court seeks UP’s reply Pleas against ban on manufacturing of food products with halal certification
![sc](https://pynr.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/sc-1.jpg)
The lawyer argued the issue was required to be examined.